After six weeks of testimony from Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s authorized groups, either side delivered closing arguments at this time, and jury deliberations started. The seven-person jury should now attain a verdict on whether or not Depp’s ex-wife’s home violence claims, which stem from a 2018 op-ed within the Washington Submit, have been defamatory towards Depp. Heard has countersued Depp for $100 million, claiming damages from Depp’s swimsuit and statements from his legal professionals.
Following greater than 100 hours of testimony, Decide Penney Azcarate instructed the jury on how you can deal with their deliberations transferring ahead. For Depp’s defamation swimsuit, a conclusion have to be made about whether or not Heard’s op-ed was false, defamatory, confirmed precise malice, and was in reference to Depp. For Heard’s countersuit, a conclusion have to be made about whether or not Depp’s lawyer Adam Waldman statements—which described Heard’s claims as “a hoax”—have been defamatory to Heard.
Depp’s staff’s closing statements
Depp’s legal professionals Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew each took activates the stand, offering highlights of varied witness testimony clips, asserting to the jurors that Heard allegedly fabricated her arguments and must be thought-about “the true abuser.”
“He has misplaced nothing lower than all the things due to Ms. Heard’s lies,” Chew stated. Depp’s staff additionally referenced earlier testimonies alleging that Heard confirmed signs of borderline persona dysfunction, and noting that she didn’t but donate her full $7 million divorce settlement to the American Civil Liberties Union as promised. She additionally probably supplied TMZ with a tip forward of submitting a restraining order towards Depp at a Los Angeles court docket six years in the past, the legal professionals stated.
“This isn’t a Me Too state of affairs,” Vasquez stated. “There aren’t any me too’s, simply not me’s”—a reference to Heard releasing the op-ed in 2018, throughout the peak of the #MeToo motion.
Heard’s staff’s closing statements
Heard’s legal professionals Benjamin Rottenborn and Elaine Bredehoft countered Depp’s staff’s arguments, claiming that Depp is the true “monster” and that the proof overwhelmingly leaned in Heard’s favor. Their closing arguments included varied images, movies, and audio clips that referenced Depp’s alleged drug and alcohol abuse and alleged violent habits and language. Additionally they defended Heard’s proper to the First Modification of freedom of speech.
“It’s not about whether or not you assume Ms. Heard could have been abusive to Mr. Depp,” stated Rottenborn. “Keep in mind, if you happen to assume they have been each abusive to one another, then Amber wins.”
What occurs subsequent?
With either side having rested their case, the jury is now adjourned for deliberations. If the jury memebrs don’t attain a verdict by Friday night, they’ll return for deliberations on Might 31, after the vacation weekend. Decide Azcarte has granted Heard’s request to seal the jury’s identities for as much as a 12 months.
Extra Should-Learn Tales From TIME